The Indiana Legislature has recently voted to amend the state Constitution to prohibit same-sex marriage in Indiana. This matter will not be voted on by the public for some time, but in the interim, there are lawsuits moving forward regarding the same-sex marriage ban Indiana already has in place (by statute and caselaw). Recently, four (4) lawsuits have been filed in Federal Court regarding Indiana’s ban on same-sex marriage. Indiana Code 31-11-1-1 defines marriage as between a man ...
November 5, 2013 / Family Law
Recent blogs have discussed civil protective orders and related matters when there is a harm or threat of harm from a family or household member1. In filing a petition for a civil protection order, the party petitioning for same must check whether the person they are seeking to protect themselves against relationship to them2. For example, the person may ...
A topic Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. has blogged about before is the new emancipation statute effective July 1, 2012, the new child support statute inIndianagoes into effect. However, there has been a recent case decided by the Indiana Court of Appeals which gives into how the Indiana Court of Appeals may view and apply ...
Statutes of Limitations: Drop Dead Dates and What They Mean to Your Case In the Trial Court or Court of Appeals
April 12, 2012 / Appellate Practice
The American court system is one filled with deadlines: deadlines for discovery to find out important information to proceed with a case to trial, deadlines for filings of numerous types, and to begin with, deadlines for initiating a lawsuit. There are numerous rules in the court system regarding statutes of limitation and when one can timely file a lawsuit (or appeal by a Notice of Appeal). Often, one of the first questions Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. attorneys ask when speaking ...
August 18, 2011 / Firearms Law
At Ciyou & Dixon, P.C., we have sometimes been asked by clients and other attorneys about firearms seized by police that are not forfeited as apart of a criminal proceeding. We have frequently shared the position we believe strikes the right balance between public safety and a citizen’s property. This distillation culls out a difference between owning the property (the firearms) and possessing them. This seems to flow from the controlling criminal statute generally addressing property seized by police officers ...
At Ciyou & Dixon, P.C., we frequently receive questions from our clients and the general public about Indiana’s self-defense laws, given our practice area covering firearms law. A number of legal concepts applicable to the use of deadly force are well developed. This blog post starts with these. First, Indiana’s self-defense statutes have long provided a legal justification for the use of deadly force in three (3) factual circumstances: To prevent serious bodily injury or death. To prevent a forcible felony (there ...
The penal law for the “property” exception (where a License was not required to lawfully carry a handgun) was not well defined before SB 506 was enacted. The statute merely set out that a License was not required to carry “on the person’s property.” Very few reported appellate cases addressed this exception directly or indirectly. ...
This question is one that has played itself time and again through US history and in every state. The legal concept of preemption may apply to any matter. In basic form, it asks the question of who should decide a matter — the State or the local government. Many years ago, Indiana law fundamentally changed on how this was viewed. Until this, the only power a local branch of government possessed to regulate its affairs ...