Call Now

Call Now

Call Now

Blog

Unpaid Child Support: Who is the Victim?

Unpaid Child Support: Who is the Victim?

In domestic cases, child support is often a key component to the matter, and who will pay and how much are complex questions that may be litigated. When a child support duty is ordered by a Court, the noncustodial parent who is to pay child support owes that support to the child(ren)1.

However, what happens in cases where the noncustodial parent does not pay child support and the child has become emancipated (currently, at age 19)? Previous blogs have discussed potential means by which to enforce a child support order including contempt petitions, revocation of non-payer’s driver’s license, and even jail time.

In cases where back child support is owed by a parent, but that parent does not face criminal charges until the child is emancipated, the custodial parent, who was not paid that child support, can be considered the victim, and restitution (repayment) of unpaid child support can go to that parent.

A recent Indiana Supreme Court case came to this conclusion that a custodial parent is a “victim” for restitution purposes of the non-custodial parent’s crimes for failure to pay child support. In Sickels v. State of Indiana, Father was criminally charged with three (3) counts of felony nonsupport of a dependent child after accumulating a child support arrearage of $84,000.002.

Due to Mr. Sickels being out of state and having to be extradited to Indiana to face these felony charges, by the time the trial and sentencing were completed, the children of the marriage were all emancipated; and therefore, Mother was named the “victim” in the case to receive restitution. The Court of Appeals held that Mother was not the victim, but rather the children were, as it has been generally established that “child support payments are for the benefit of the child, not for the benefit of the parent”.

The Indiana Supreme Court disagreed, and found that Mother was, in fact, the victim. Restitution is available to those who “have suffered injury, harm, or loss as a direct result of the criminal acts of a defendant”. In the case at hand, Mother did not receive child support from Father, and therefore, had to fully support the children without his Court-ordered assistance.  That money Mother spent that should have been supplemented as support paid by Father was Mother’s loss, and therefore, she is the victim3.

As a public policy matter, the Court found that the problem with not allowing a custodial parent to be a victim means that potentially, dependent children could be responsible for suing their parents for unpaid child support.  This would not only be potentially awkward, but might require the child to have to hire his/her own attorney to sue their parent. Naming the custodial parent as victim instead of the child removes this problem.

Child support is a contentious and often litigated matter in domestic law. Understanding the rights and duties of all parties regarding child support matters can prevent future issues. We hope that this blog post has been helpful in understanding restitution for unpaid child support.  Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. practices throughout the state of Indiana. This blog post was written by attorney, Jessica Keyes.


  1. See e.g. Ind. Code §31-16-6-et al, Ind. Code §31-14-11-et al
  2. Sickels v. State, February, 2013
  3. The Court noted this is a general rule, and emancipated children may be victims and entitled to back support in limited instances. Also, the Court held that the custodial parent is not the only possible victim.
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on email
Email

We Listen & Care

Proven & experienced attorneys successfully advocating & resolving complex cases for over 25 years

Quick Contact

Need to talk now? Fill out the quick form below and we will contact you directly.
Blog Categories

Get In Touch

We're available to answer your questions 24/7.

Related Videos

Contact Us

Please fill out the form below and we will be in touch with you shortly.

Ciyou & Dixon, P.C., is a law firm located in Indianapolis, Indiana. We serve clients in six core practice areas: family lawappellate practicefirearms lawgeneral practicepersonal injury and criminal law.

Call Now

Copyright © 2021 Ciyou & Dixon, P.C., Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved. This Site does not provide legal advice; please review the disclaimer for other limitations. Privacy Policy

Based in Indianapolis and founded in 1995, Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. is a niche law firm focused on successfully dealing with the complexities of divorce, high-conflict child custody and family law. Known for their ability to solve extremely complex situations with high quality work and responsiveness, Ciyou & Dixon will guide you every step of the way. The family law attorneys at Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. will help you precisely identify your objectives and the means to reach your desired result. In addition, this practice focus is augmented by the firm's other three core areas, namely appellate advocacy, civil practice, and firearms law. Life is uncertain. Be certain of your counselSM.

Indianapolis Divorce Attorneys, Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. of Indianapolis, Indiana, offers legal services for Indianapolis, Zionsville, Noblesville, Carmel, Avon, Anderson, Danville, Greenwood, Brownsburg, Geist, Fortville, McCordsville, Muncie, Greenfield, Westfield, Fort Wayne, Fishers, Bloomington, Lafayette, Marion County, Hamilton County, Hendricks County, Allen County, Delaware County, Morgan County, Hendricks County, Boone County, Vigo County, Johnson County, Hancock County, and Tippecanoe County, Indiana.