Now Hiring Experienced Attorneys

Call Now

Call Now

Call Now

Blog

Breaking News, What You Need To Know: Court Of Appeals Finds Video Evidence Sufficient To Uphold Attempted Murder Conviction

Breaking News, What You Need To Know: Court Of Appeals Finds Video Evidence Sufficient To Uphold Attempted Murder Conviction

As we all know, individuals do not have the right to take another’s life. The law is clear and unambiguous as to that point. It is safe to say that the law values human life over all other individual rights ten-fold. This is why individuals are never allowed to kill people who come onto their land to steal or cause damage to the property. The law will always value life over things, and therefore provides us with very limited and defined exceptions to this rule. The biggest and most well-known exception is self-defense. Self-defense is the idea that an individual can use deadly force to protect themselves from another when the individual is in danger of being killed or extremely hurt by that person. But how far does this defense go? The Indiana Court of Appeals recently dealt with this question in its recent decision of Quinn v. State.1

In Quinn, the Court of Appeals was asked to overturn a conviction of attempted murder because the State failed to rebut the Defendant’s self-defense claim. In 2017, the Defendant, Quinn, went to the home of Darryl Boone and his fiancé. According to Quinn, he went over there to talk to them about some recent Facebook posts that were alarming. Upon arriving at Boone’s home, Quinn began banging on the front door. When asked who it was, Quinn refused to answer. Boone thereby armed himself with a handgun. Quinn too had a firearm in his possession. Quinn thereby proceeded to open the door, and the two individuals raised the firearms at each other. Quinn fired two shots at Boone and injured him. Quinn was subsequently charged with attempted murder. At trial, the prosecution introduced security video from Boone’s home, showing the exchange. The trial court thereby convicted Quinn of attempted murder. Quinn appealed.

On appeal, Quinn argued that the State failed to present evidence to rebut the specific elements of self-defense. The Court of Appeals, in affirming the decision, noted the three elements a defendant must show to prove self-defense. The Court found that the prosecution presented plenty of evidence to rebut the self-defense claim. Specifically, the fact that Quinn went to Boone’s home uninvited, knocked on his door for long period of time, and walked around the house holding a loaded firearm. The Court stated “[t]his evidence alone supports a finding that Quinn provoked, instigated, or willingly participated in the violence that subsequently ensued.” For those reasons, Quinn’s arguments failed, and the conviction was affirmed.

This case highlights the importance of staying up to date in the ever-changing legal landscape. Video evidence largely convicted this defendant. Knowing the status of developments in the law is the key to avoiding criminal liability, as well as being an engaged citizenry in our participatory system of government. This blog post on a key new case was written by attorneys at Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. who handle criminal defense cases and appeals of criminal convictions throughout the state. This blog is written for educational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice or a solicitation for services. It is an advertisement.


  1. Herbert Quinn v. State of Indiana, 18A-CR-2256 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019).

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on email
Email

We Listen & Care

Proven & experienced attorneys successfully advocating & resolving complex cases for over 25 years

Quick Contact

Need to talk now? Fill out the quick form below and we will contact you directly.
Blog Categories

Get In Touch

We're available to answer your questions 24/7.

Related Videos

Contact Us

Please fill out the form below and we will be in touch with you shortly.

Ciyou & Dixon, P.C., is a law firm located in Indianapolis, Indiana. We serve clients in six core practice areas: family lawappellate practicefirearms lawgeneral practicepersonal injury and criminal law.

Copyright © 2021 Ciyou & Dixon, P.C., Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved. This Site does not provide legal advice; please review the disclaimer for other limitations. Privacy Policy

Based in Indianapolis and founded in 1995, Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. is a niche law firm focused on successfully dealing with the complexities of divorce, high-conflict child custody and family law. Known for their ability to solve extremely complex situations with high quality work and responsiveness, Ciyou & Dixon will guide you every step of the way. The family law attorneys at Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. will help you precisely identify your objectives and the means to reach your desired result. In addition, this practice focus is augmented by the firm's other three core areas, namely appellate advocacy, civil practice, and firearms law. Life is uncertain. Be certain of your counselSM.

Indianapolis Divorce Attorneys, Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. of Indianapolis, Indiana, offers legal services for Indianapolis, Zionsville, Noblesville, Carmel, Avon, Anderson, Danville, Greenwood, Brownsburg, Geist, Fortville, McCordsville, Muncie, Greenfield, Westfield, Fort Wayne, Fishers, Bloomington, Lafayette, Marion County, Hamilton County, Hendricks County, Allen County, Delaware County, Morgan County, Hendricks County, Boone County, Vigo County, Johnson County, Hancock County, and Tippecanoe County, Indiana.